Why do we keep repeating behaviours we already understand? Psychological insight helps us recognise a pattern, but behavioural change has to happen when that pattern is activated. Change begins when awareness is followed by a different response at the moment the familiar behaviour feels safest.
One of the main issues I see in therapy is when someone understands exactly what they are doing and still finds themselves doing it. They recognise the main signs of codependency in their behaviour but continue to repeat them, even when they know it is not in their best interests. They know they are people-pleasing but agree to do something they truly do not want to do. They understand that frantically sending a message is connected to fear of abandonment, but they still send it after promising themselves they would not. They can explain their attachment history but still become anxious when they feel distance from someone.
People often continue repeating patterns they already understand because psychological insight and behavioural change are different processes. Insight allows us to observe and understand. Behavioural change has to take place when the pattern is active, the nervous system has registered a perceived threat and familiar defences are offering a quick way to reduce discomfort.
Why do we repeat patterns we already understand?
When we are calm, it can seem perfectly reasonable to decide that next time we will hold the boundary, resist the urge to chase or stop taking responsibility for somebody else’s feelings. The difficulty comes when the situation actually occurs. Fear of conflict, rejection, abandonment or disapproval becomes immediate, and the old response suddenly feels much safer.
This is one reason codependent patterns can be so persistent. People-pleasing reduces the threat of conflict. Reassurance-seeking can temporarily reduce anxiety, and pursuing someone who is distant may briefly create a sense of connection. Taking responsibility for another person’s difficulties can restore a sense of control. These behaviours may create problems over time, but in the moment they often work because they reduce discomfort.
Reflective question: What do you understand about yourself intellectually but continue doing behaviourally? If you stopped doing it, what feeling would you need to tolerate instead?
Where behavioural change actually begins
There comes a point when gaining more understanding is not what is required. A different experience is.
If you normally explain yourself excessively, the work may be to give a reasonable answer and stop. If you tend to pursue somebody when they withdraw, it may mean allowing the silence to remain rather than immediately trying to restore connection. If you automatically step in to rescue, it may mean recognising the urge without acting on it.
What follows may feel highly uncomfortable. Guilt, anxiety or uncertainty can create a strong temptation to return to familiar patterns. This is the point where behavioural change begins. The nervous system needs experience as well as understanding. It needs to learn that another person’s disappointment can be tolerated, that silence does not automatically mean abandonment and that setting a reasonable boundary does not necessarily place a relationship in danger.
Awareness remains essential because it allows us to see the pattern. But eventually, what we understand has to become something we practise. Awareness tells you where the door is. Action means walking through it. The related article When Self-Awareness Becomes Another Way of Staying Stuck explores how further analysis can itself become a form of avoidance.
Frequently asked questions
Why is insight alone not enough to change behaviour?
Insight is usually available when we are calm. The familiar behaviour returns when fear, guilt or uncertainty is active because it offers immediate emotional relief. Change requires practising a different response during that uncomfortable moment.
What is the smallest useful step towards change?
Choose one observable response you can repeat: pause before sending another message, give a concise answer without over-explaining or allow somebody else to solve a problem you would normally take over.
Does discomfort mean the new response is wrong?
Not necessarily. A healthier boundary can initially feel unsafe simply because it is unfamiliar. Notice the discomfort, assess the actual situation and give your nervous system time to learn that a different response can be tolerated.
If you understand your patterns but still struggle to change what happens when you are triggered, my Codependency: Awareness to Action programme is designed specifically to help bridge that gap. I also offer a free initial consultation if you would like to discuss whether the programme or individual therapy is right for you.
About Dr Nicholas Jenner
Dr Nicholas Jenner is a therapist and coach with more than 20 years’ experience. He specialises in codependency, attachment and relationship patterns, using approaches including Internal Family Systems (IFS) to help people turn insight into practical change. He offers online therapy and therapeutic groups.
Discover more from THE ONLINE THERAPIST
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
